Forum

SMRT
 
Notifications
Clear all

SMRT

1,359 Posts
133 Users
0 Reactions
436.6 K Views
(@spore1)
Posts: 2082
Noble Member
 

Speculation .. Let mkt tells u come Mon .

Posted: July 17, 2016 12:20 pm
Posted by: @happyharvest

then why did SBS react to the upside to the news?
Posted: July 16, 2016 7:24 pm
Posted by: @sheerluck

So if based on 5% EBIT margin as a guideline on revenue of $1.3bil, SMRT EBIT will be about $65mil per year. Their note interest is about $12.5mil so after deducting interest and tax, the NP is about $44mil. If they payout 100%, then div will be abour 3cts. At current price of $1.55, that' s about 2% yield which is half of what they used to paid.

If fund seeks better yield, they will pull out of SMRT and go somewhere else.

Also since under the NRFF, the lease is 15 years rather than 30 years, will PE adjust to reflect this?

I don' t see any upside for SMRT more flat or downside.


 
Posted : 17/07/2016 8:52 am
(@happyharvest)
Posts: 536
Honorable Member
 

then why did SBS react to the upside to the news?

Posted: July 16, 2016 7:24 pm
Posted by: @sheerluck

So if based on 5% EBIT margin as a guideline on revenue of $1.3bil, SMRT EBIT will be about $65mil per year. Their note interest is about $12.5mil so after deducting interest and tax, the NP is about $44mil. If they payout 100%, then div will be abour 3cts. At current price of $1.55, that' s about 2% yield which is half of what they used to paid.

If fund seeks better yield, they will pull out of SMRT and go somewhere else.

Also since under the NRFF, the lease is 15 years rather than 30 years, will PE adjust to reflect this?

I don' t see any upside for SMRT more flat or downside.

 
Posted : 17/07/2016 4:20 am
(@happyharvest)
Posts: 536
Honorable Member
 

the previous CEO said sustainable as she cut on maintance. The current CEO said not sutainable as now they have pressured to improve on their maintance.

Posted: July 17, 2016 11:59 am
Posted by: @investshare

The board has to answer this, if the current model is not sustainable, then why in the past it gave out huge dividend to shareholders.

 
Posted : 17/07/2016 4:19 am
(@investshare)
Posts: 1174
Noble Member
 

The board has to answer this, if the current model is not sustainable, then why in the past it gave out huge dividend to shareholders.

 
Posted : 17/07/2016 3:59 am
(@enjoylife77)
Posts: 239
Estimable Member
 

Average EBIT drop from 15% to 5%., I wonder how will SMRT mitigate the big fall to sustain the dividend payout.

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 5:28 pm
(@pinkowl)
Posts: 5166
Illustrious Member
 

Smrt has other business too. Cab, bus, retail, advertising etc.

Posted: July 16, 2016 7:24 pm
Posted by: @sheerluck

So if based on 5% EBIT margin as a guideline on revenue of $1.3bil, SMRT EBIT will be about $65mil per year. Their note interest is about $12.5mil so after deducting interest and tax, the NP is about $44mil. If they payout 100%, then div will be abour 3cts. At current price of $1.55, that' s about 2% yield which is half of what they used to paid.

If fund seeks better yield, they will pull out of SMRT and go somewhere else.

Also since under the NRFF, the lease is 15 years rather than 30 years, will PE adjust to reflect this?

I don' t see any upside for SMRT more flat or downside.

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 3:27 pm
(@sg_investor)
Posts: 115
Estimable Member
 

agree that singapore transport sectors dividend is really low.

why does MLPs can give high dividend?

Posted: July 16, 2016 7:24 pm
Posted by: @sheerluck

So if based on 5% EBIT margin as a guideline on revenue of $1.3bil, SMRT EBIT will be about $65mil per year. Their note interest is about $12.5mil so after deducting interest and tax, the NP is about $44mil. If they payout 100%, then div will be abour 3cts. At current price of $1.55, that' s about 2% yield which is half of what they used to paid.

If fund seeks better yield, they will pull out of SMRT and go somewhere else.

Also since under the NRFF, the lease is 15 years rather than 30 years, will PE adjust to reflect this?

I don' t see any upside for SMRT more flat or downside.

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 11:38 am
 H L
(@sheerluck)
Posts: 2951
Famed Member
 

So if based on 5% EBIT margin as a guideline on revenue of $1.3bil, SMRT EBIT will be about $65mil per year. Their note interest is about $12.5mil so after deducting interest and tax, the NP is about $44mil. If they payout 100%, then div will be abour 3cts. At current price of $1.55, that' s about 2% yield which is half of what they used to paid.

If fund seeks better yield, they will pull out of SMRT and go somewhere else.

Also since under the NRFF, the lease is 15 years rather than 30 years, will PE adjust to reflect this?

I don' t see any upside for SMRT more flat or downside.

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 11:24 am
(@spore1)
Posts: 2082
Noble Member
 

Is it gd time to buy or otherwise ..

Posted: July 15, 2016 5:54 pm
Posted by: @edwinjup

Mgt total salary how much??
Posted: July 15, 2016 5:51 pm
Posted by: @enjoylife77

Lta pay $991M deduct debt$762M deduct IRAS tax $159M Balance $70 M

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 9:42 am
(@sengsk)
Posts: 368
Reputable Member
 

Control by BB........

Posted: July 16, 2016 4:07 pm
Posted by: @sg_investor

The SBStransit volume was so thin though it went up 8%. Will it sustain?

What will happen to SMRT next week?

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 9:27 am
(@sg_investor)
Posts: 115
Estimable Member
 

The SBStransit volume was so thin though it went up 8%. Will it sustain?

What will happen to SMRT next week?

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 8:07 am
(@brchkho1)
Posts: 373
Reputable Member
 

Sorry pl ignore earlier post. It s in the SMRT announcement

Posted: July 16, 2016 12:24 pm
Posted by: @brchkho1

No point speculating sbout the impact. Let' s wait for the notice of EGM. The booklet will need to show shareholders about the assets to be sold and the impact too.

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 4:53 am
(@brchkho1)
Posts: 373
Reputable Member
 

No point speculating sbout the impact. Let' s wait for the notice of EGM. The booklet will need to show shareholders about the assets to be sold and the impact too.

 
Posted : 16/07/2016 4:24 am
(@qanghoo)
Posts: 5029
Illustrious Member
 

Actually, viewing from another angle, they' ve just happily shifted the cost of funding to the govt. By retiring nearly 1 bil of debt, imagine the annual interest costs saved .... around 50 mil a year, say, at around 5%+-? How will the savings be appropriately deployed?

Posted: July 15, 2016 8:11 pm
Posted by: @mrwise

There should be better profits after being asset light.

This is a money making business where ppl uses more public transport nowadays.

We should see further upsides on the stock value..

 
Posted : 15/07/2016 10:54 pm
(@k3n888)
Posts: 8
Active Member
 

my opinion, this should be good for SMRT. This will give them enough cash to bid for the thompson-east coast line. Which based on my estimate should be tendered out end of this year or next year.

 
Posted : 15/07/2016 4:11 pm
Page 57 / 91
Share:
Scroll to Top